INDRA DEVI MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 388/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010026342026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2429/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

388/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

73

Police Station

BANJARIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

INDRA DEVI MAHTO

Adv. PRADIP KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

21-02-2026

HEARING

12-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order By Court

Case Summary Court Decision: The Sessions Judge granted bail to Indradev Mahato in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115, 109, 352, and 351(2). The applicant was ordered released on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that he cooperate in the investigation. Key Reasoning: The court found the charges vague and general, noted that both parties had reached a settlement (a land dispute case was already pending), and considered the accused's long detention since January 26, 2026. The victim's injuries were determined to be simple in nature, and there was no prior criminal history against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Sessions Judge granted bail to Indradev Mahato in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115, 109, 352, and 351(2). The applicant was ordered released on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that he cooperate in the investigation. Key Reasoning: The court found the charges vague and general, noted that both parties had reached a settlement (a land dispute case was already pending), and considered the accused's long detention since January 26, 2026. The victim's injuries were determined to be simple in nature, and there was no prior criminal history against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Motihari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case