INDRA DEVI MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 388/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010026342026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2429/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
388/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
BANJARIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INDRA DEVI MAHTO
Adv. PRADIP KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The Sessions Judge granted bail to Indradev Mahato in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115, 109, 352, and 351(2). The applicant was ordered released on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that he cooperate in the investigation. Key Reasoning: The court found the charges vague and general, noted that both parties had reached a settlement (a land dispute case was already pending), and considered the accused's long detention since January 26, 2026. The victim's injuries were determined to be simple in nature, and there was no prior criminal history against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The Sessions Judge granted bail to Indradev Mahato in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115, 109, 352, and 351(2). The applicant was ordered released on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that he cooperate in the investigation. Key Reasoning: The court found the charges vague and general, noted that both parties had reached a settlement (a land dispute case was already pending), and considered the accused's long detention since January 26, 2026. The victim's injuries were determined to be simple in nature, and there was no prior criminal history against the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts