SK DAUD vs State of Bihar — 329/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010022762026

Filing Number

2105/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

329/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK DAUD

    Adv. NITESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    Case Summary The Sessions Court in East Champaran granted bail to accused Sk. Daud in Case No. 181/2025 under IPC sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 109, and 352/3(5). The court found that while the accused is charged with assaulting the complainant on 28.06.2025, the charges under Section 109 IPC are bailable, and no specific violent act was directly attributed to the accused. The court approved the bail petition on furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, directing the accused to cooperate in the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Court in East Champaran granted bail to accused Sk. Daud in Case No. 181/2025 under IPC sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 109, and 352/3(5). The court found that while the accused is charged with assaulting the complainant on 28.06.2025, the charges under Section 109 IPC are bailable, and no specific violent act was directly attributed to the accused. The court approved the bail petition on furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, directing the accused to cooperate in the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case