SAVITA DEVI AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 704/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010021472026

Filing Number

1984/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

704/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

269

Police Station

KOTWA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAVITA DEVI AND ORS

    Adv. AWANISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Savita Devi and Parmila Devi, who were accused of kidnapping a minor girl under IPC Section 366A and POCSO Act Sections 8/12. The court found direct and specific allegations against the petitioners, including the victim's statement that they kidnapped her using an intoxicating substance and demanded ransom, making the charges serious and against public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 704/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Savita Devi and Parmila Devi, who were accused of kidnapping a minor girl under IPC Section 366A and POCSO Act Sections 8/12. The court found direct and specific allegations against the petitioners, including the victim's statement that they kidnapped her using an intoxicating substance and demanded ransom, making the charges serious and against public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case