RAHUL PASWAN AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 650/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010019422026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1789/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
650/2026
Registration Date
31-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
437
Police Station
KALAYANPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAHUL PASWAN AND ORS
Adv. DR.ADHIR KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted anticipatory bail to nine accused persons (Rahul Paswan and eight others) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 74, 109, 303(2), 351(2), and 352/3(5). The court found that the charges of murder (IPC 109), outraging modesty (IPC 74), and criminal intimidation (IPC 303(2)) were not substantiated, and considering the parties' reconciliation, mutual settlement agreement with photographic evidence, and the applicants' clean criminal history, bail was approved. The accused were directed to furnish a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties and cooperate during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of East Champaran granted anticipatory bail to nine accused persons (Rahul Paswan and eight others) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 74, 109, 303(2), 351(2), and 352/3(5). The court found that the charges of murder (IPC 109), outraging modesty (IPC 74), and criminal intimidation (IPC 303(2)) were not substantiated, and considering the parties' reconciliation, mutual settlement agreement with photographic evidence, and the applicants' clean criminal history, bail was approved. The accused were directed to furnish a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties and cooperate during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts