KUNDAN KUMAR ALIAS KUNDAN KUMAR SINGH vs State of Bihar — 287/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010018222026
Filing Number
1675/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
287/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KUNDAN KUMAR ALIAS KUNDAN KUMAR SINGH
Adv. KAUSHLENDRA KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order By Court
The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Kundan Kumar, accused of murder (IPC §302), destruction of evidence (§201), and criminal conspiracy (§120B) in connection with the death of Shatyam Pandey. The court found the allegations serious, noting that co-accused Chandan Singh's confessional statement implicated the petitioner, and considered the petitioner's two prior criminal convictions as aggravating factors warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 287/2026
The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Kundan Kumar, accused of murder (IPC §302), destruction of evidence (§201), and criminal conspiracy (§120B) in connection with the death of Shatyam Pandey. The court found the allegations serious, noting that co-accused Chandan Singh's confessional statement implicated the petitioner, and considered the petitioner's two prior criminal convictions as aggravating factors warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts