RAKESH PATEL vs State of Bihar — 580/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010016432026

Filing Number

1505/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

580/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

469

Police Station

SUGAULI

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH PATEL

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    The court rejected Rakesh Patel's anticipatory bail petition in a serious POCSO case involving alleged kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor girl. The court found the allegations direct and specific, supported by the victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC, and deemed Patel the main accused; given the gravity of the offences and ongoing investigation, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Rakesh Patel's anticipatory bail petition in a serious POCSO case involving alleged kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor girl. The court found the allegations direct and specific, supported by the victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC, and deemed Patel the main accused; given the gravity of the offences and ongoing investigation, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case