Sanjay Kumar Singh vs Bir Shamsher Singh and 3 others — 137/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,307/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.

SESSION CASE

CNR: BREC010012182016

Case disposed

Filing Number

1133/2016

Filing Date

22-02-2016

Registration No

137/2016

Registration Date

22-02-2016

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

202

Police Station

RAXAUL

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 341,323,324,307/34

Petitioner(s)

Sanjay Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

Bir Shamsher Singh and 3 others

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge

24-04-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-04-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

16-03-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

10-03-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

24-04-2026
Judgment

Court Decision Summary Court: Sessions Court, East Champaran, Motihari Judge: Abhishek K. Das Date: 24 April 2026 Decision: All four accused persons—Bir Samsher Singh, Balister Singh, Majister Singh, and Munna Singh—were acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 447/34, 323/34, 324/34, 341/34, 307/34, 504/34, and 379 IPC. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and feeble, with four key witnesses declared hostile and the informant later retracting his allegations, stating the injury resulted from an accidental fall rather than an assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary Court: Sessions Court, East Champaran, Motihari Judge: Abhishek K. Das Date: 24 April 2026 Decision: All four accused persons—Bir Samsher Singh, Balister Singh, Majister Singh, and Munna Singh—were acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 447/34, 323/34, 324/34, 341/34, 307/34, 504/34, and 379 IPC. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and feeble, with four key witnesses declared hostile and the informant later retracting his allegations, stating the injury resulted from an accidental fall rather than an assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Motihari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case