SUNIL KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 428/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010012052026
Filing Number
1089/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
428/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL KUMAR
Adv. AMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
The court dismissed Sunil Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a murder case (IPC §302, 201, 120B) involving the death of Shaytam Pandey. The Sessions Judge held the petition unmaintainable because process under Cr.P.C. §82 had already been issued against the petitioner, relying on Supreme Court precedent in *Prem Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar* and High Court guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 428/2026
The court dismissed Sunil Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a murder case (IPC §302, 201, 120B) involving the death of Shaytam Pandey. The Sessions Judge held the petition unmaintainable because process under Cr.P.C. §82 had already been issued against the petitioner, relying on Supreme Court precedent in *Prem Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar* and High Court guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts