SABIR MIAN vs State of Bihar — 422/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010011992026
Filing Number
1083/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
422/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
143
Police Station
TURKOLIA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SABIR MIAN
Adv. KHUB LAL PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Order By CourtView PDF
The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Sabir Mian's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving allegations of violent assault with weapons causing grievous injuries to the informant. The court found that the petitioner was named in the FIR with serious charges including assault with an iron rod that fractured the victim's chest bone, and the medical injury report confirmed grievous injuries, making it improper to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 422/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Sabir Mian's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving allegations of violent assault with weapons causing grievous injuries to the informant. The court found that the petitioner was named in the FIR with serious charges including assault with an iron rod that fractured the victim's chest bone, and the medical injury report confirmed grievous injuries, making it improper to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts