SAVITA DEVI vs State of Bihar — 396/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010011422026
Filing Number
1029/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
396/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
244
Police Station
KOTWA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAVITA DEVI
Adv. CHANDRALOKI KUMAR MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Order By Court
Case Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Savita Devi, who was accused of involvement in a dowry-related murder case. The judge found credible evidence in the FIR, witness statements, and post-mortem report indicating the petitioner participated in forcibly aborting the pregnant victim and subsequently murdering her when she resisted, making pre-arrest bail inappropriate despite the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 396/2026
Case Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Savita Devi, who was accused of involvement in a dowry-related murder case. The judge found credible evidence in the FIR, witness statements, and post-mortem report indicating the petitioner participated in forcibly aborting the pregnant victim and subsequently murdering her when she resisted, making pre-arrest bail inappropriate despite the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts