KAMLESH KUMAR ALIAS KAMLESH SAH vs State of Bihar — 395/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010011272026
Filing Number
1016/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
395/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
332
Police Station
RAJEPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMLESH KUMAR ALIAS KAMLESH SAH
Adv. VISHAL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order By Court
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Kamlesh Kumar, who was accused of selling or killing the informant's daughter (a dancer in his musical group who went missing on 22-11-2025). The court found credible evidence including witness corroboration, the victim remaining traceless, ongoing investigation, and the petitioner's prior criminal record under IPC sections 304(B) and 201/34, making him unsuitable for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 395/2026
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Kamlesh Kumar, who was accused of selling or killing the informant's daughter (a dancer in his musical group who went missing on 22-11-2025). The court found credible evidence including witness corroboration, the victim remaining traceless, ongoing investigation, and the petitioner's prior criminal record under IPC sections 304(B) and 201/34, making him unsuitable for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts