PARDESH KUMAR AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 310/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010007762026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

696/2026

Filing Date

15-01-2026

Registration No

310/2026

Registration Date

16-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

279

Police Station

MOTIHARI MUFFASSIL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

PARDESH KUMAR AND ORS

Adv. SACHIN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th

23-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

10-02-2026

HEARING

03-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order By Court

Summary The court partially granted anticipatory bail to four of five accused petitioners (Pawan Kumar, Nirmala Devi, Pushpa Devi, and Kiran Devi) in a kidnapping and POCSO Act case, as the victim's statement contained no adverse allegations against them. However, the court rejected anticipatory bail for Pardeshi Kumar, the main accused, as the victim's direct statement placed him at the scene and implicated him in taking the minor girl to Mumbai and Delhi; the court emphasized the victim's minor status and seriousness of charges against society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially granted anticipatory bail to four of five accused petitioners (Pawan Kumar, Nirmala Devi, Pushpa Devi, and Kiran Devi) in a kidnapping and POCSO Act case, as the victim's statement contained no adverse allegations against them. However, the court rejected anticipatory bail for Pardeshi Kumar, the main accused, as the victim's direct statement placed him at the scene and implicated him in taking the minor girl to Mumbai and Delhi; the court emphasized the victim's minor status and seriousness of charges against society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Motihari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case