PARDESH KUMAR AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 310/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010007762026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
696/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
310/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
279
Police Station
MOTIHARI MUFFASSIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARDESH KUMAR AND ORS
Adv. SACHIN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 6th
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 03-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially granted anticipatory bail to four of five accused petitioners (Pawan Kumar, Nirmala Devi, Pushpa Devi, and Kiran Devi) in a kidnapping and POCSO Act case, as the victim's statement contained no adverse allegations against them. However, the court rejected anticipatory bail for Pardeshi Kumar, the main accused, as the victim's direct statement placed him at the scene and implicated him in taking the minor girl to Mumbai and Delhi; the court emphasized the victim's minor status and seriousness of charges against society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially granted anticipatory bail to four of five accused petitioners (Pawan Kumar, Nirmala Devi, Pushpa Devi, and Kiran Devi) in a kidnapping and POCSO Act case, as the victim's statement contained no adverse allegations against them. However, the court rejected anticipatory bail for Pardeshi Kumar, the main accused, as the victim's direct statement placed him at the scene and implicated him in taking the minor girl to Mumbai and Delhi; the court emphasized the victim's minor status and seriousness of charges against society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts