SHANKAR SINGH AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 299/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 10th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010007552026
Filing Number
676/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
299/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANKAR SINGH AND ORS
Adv. SUMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order By Court
The Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners (Shankar Singh, Indu Devi, Praveen Kumar, and Gyan Babu) in a case involving alleged offences under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioners no longer apprehended arrest at that juncture. The dismissal was granted with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Court again if any apprehension of arrest arises in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 299/2026
The Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners (Shankar Singh, Indu Devi, Praveen Kumar, and Gyan Babu) in a case involving alleged offences under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioners no longer apprehended arrest at that juncture. The dismissal was granted with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Court again if any apprehension of arrest arises in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts