AJEET DHAR vs State of Bihar — 289/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010007452026

Filing Number

666/2026

Filing Date

15-Jan-2026

Registration No

289/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

299

Police Station

CHAITAUNI

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJEET DHAR

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order By Court

    Summary: The Sessions Court rejected Ajeet Dhar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving allegations of assault, wrongful restraint, theft, and dowry prohibition offenses. The court found credible evidence supporting the FIR, including medical reports documenting injuries and witness corroboration, and noted this was the petitioner's third bail petition with no new material presented. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the lower court and seek regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court rejected Ajeet Dhar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving allegations of assault, wrongful restraint, theft, and dowry prohibition offenses. The court found credible evidence supporting the FIR, including medical reports documenting injuries and witness corroboration, and noted this was the petitioner's third bail petition with no new material presented. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the lower court and seek regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case