NAUSHAD ANSARI vs State of Bihar — 152/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010003172026
Filing Number
276/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
152/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
450
Police Station
SANGRAMPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAUSHAD ANSARI
Adv. AJEET KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Order By Court
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Nausad Ansari, who was accused of attacking the informant's family with 20-25 others, causing injuries and property damage. The court found the FIR allegations credible, supported by the informant's restatement and multiple witness accounts in the case diary, along with injury reports of three family members, making it unfit for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 152/2026
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Nausad Ansari, who was accused of attacking the informant's family with 20-25 others, causing injuries and property damage. The court found the FIR allegations credible, supported by the informant's restatement and multiple witness accounts in the case diary, along with injury reports of three family members, making it unfit for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts