State of Bihar THROUGH UPENDRA SAHANI vs SHAMBHU SHANI — 4/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,354,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BREC010000042025

Filing Number

4/2025

Filing Date

02-Jan-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

02-Jan-2025

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

CHIRAIYA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,354,504,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar THROUGH UPENDRA SAHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAMBHU SHANI

  2. 2.LAKHICHAN SAHNI

  3. 3.MUKHLAL SAHNI

  4. 4.RAMPRASAD SAHNI

  5. 5.BAHADUR SAHNI

  6. 6.RANDHIR SAHNI

  7. 7.SUDHA DEVI

  8. 8.RAVI RANJAN KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The East Champaran Sessions Court acquitted all eight defendants (Shanbu Sahni, Lakhi Chun Sahni, Mukhlal Sahni, Ram Prasad Sahni, Bahadur Sahni, Ranadhir Sahni, Sudha Devi, and Raviranjan Kumar) on charges under IPC sections 323, 325, 307, 354, 341, and 504, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite prosecution testimony. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the violent mob attack narrative through credible witness testimony, as victims' statements contradicted the initial FIR description of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Statement Us.313 Cr.p.c.

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  13. 14-Oct-2025

    Statement Us.313 Cr.p.c.

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  15. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  16. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  17. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  19. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  20. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  21. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  22. 28-May-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  23. 24-May-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  24. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  25. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  26. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  27. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  28. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  29. 13-Jan-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  30. 04-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 02-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The East Champaran Sessions Court acquitted all eight defendants (Shanbu Sahni, Lakhi Chun Sahni, Mukhlal Sahni, Ram Prasad Sahni, Bahadur Sahni, Ranadhir Sahni, Sudha Devi, and Raviranjan Kumar) on charges under IPC sections 323, 325, 307, 354, 341, and 504, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite prosecution testimony. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the violent mob attack narrative through credible witness testimony, as victims' statements contradicted the initial FIR description of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case