Chandrakala Devi vs Sanjay Yadav and 08 Others — 665/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,325,504,307,34,. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE on 09th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRDA210007952020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
794/2020
Filing Date
14-08-2020
Registration No
665/2020
Registration Date
14-08-2020
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
BIRAUL
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrakala Devi
Adv. Ajay Kumar Lall (A.P.O)
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Yadav and 08 Others
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Disposed
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 11-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate accepted a joint compromise petition and acquitted four accused persons (Sanjay Yadav, Manoj Yadav, Ramanjee Yadav, and Bhola Yadav) under Section 320(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that sections 341, 323, 325, and 506 IPC were compoundable offences, and while section 354(B) was non-compoundable, the prosecution witnesses denied the accused's involvement, leaving the charge unproven beyond reasonable doubt. The bailors were discharged from their bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate accepted a joint compromise petition and acquitted four accused persons (Sanjay Yadav, Manoj Yadav, Ramanjee Yadav, and Bhola Yadav) under Section 320(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that sections 341, 323, 325, and 506 IPC were compoundable offences, and while section 354(B) was non-compoundable, the prosecution witnesses denied the accused's involvement, leaving the charge unproven beyond reasonable doubt. The bailors were discharged from their bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts