Chandrakala Devi vs Sanjay Yadav and 08 Others — 665/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,325,504,307,34. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE on 09th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRDA210007952020
Filing Number
794/2020
Filing Date
14-Aug-2020
Registration No
665/2020
Registration Date
14-Aug-2020
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
BIRAUL
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandrakala Devi
Adv. Ajay Kumar Lall (A.P.O)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanjay Yadav and 08 Others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
The Judicial Magistrate accepted a joint compromise petition and acquitted four accused persons (Sanjay Yadav, Manoj Yadav, Ramanjee Yadav, and Bhola Yadav) under Section 320(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that sections 341, 323, 325, and 506 IPC were compoundable offences, and while section 354(B) was non-compoundable, the prosecution witnesses denied the accused's involvement, leaving the charge unproven beyond reasonable doubt. The bailors were discharged from their bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
20-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
02-Aug-2025
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 2nd Class-I
-
07-Jul-2025
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 2nd Class-I
-
23-Apr-2025
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
06-Feb-2025
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
02-Dec-2024
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
06-Sep-2024
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
25-Jun-2024
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
08-Apr-2024
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
25-Jan-2024
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
29-Nov-2023
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
21-Sep-2023
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
04-Aug-2023
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
06-Jun-2023
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
20-Apr-2023
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
28-Feb-2023
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
17-Feb-2023
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
10-Jan-2023
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
29-Nov-2022
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
14-Oct-2022
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
26-Aug-2022
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
15-Jul-2022
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
14-Jun-2022
Appearence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
22-Apr-2022
Appearence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
26-Feb-2022
Appearence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
07-Jan-2022
Appearence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
29-Oct-2021
Appearence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
21-Aug-2021
Appearence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
11-Jun-2021
Appearence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
20-Apr-2021
Appearence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
25-Feb-2021
Supply of Police Paper
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
03-Feb-2021
Supply of Police Paper
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Dec-2020
Supply of Police Paper
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Nov-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 665/2020
The Judicial Magistrate accepted a joint compromise petition and acquitted four accused persons (Sanjay Yadav, Manoj Yadav, Ramanjee Yadav, and Bhola Yadav) under Section 320(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that sections 341, 323, 325, and 506 IPC were compoundable offences, and while section 354(B) was non-compoundable, the prosecution witnesses denied the accused's involvement, leaving the charge unproven beyond reasonable doubt. The bailors were discharged from their bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts