kumkum devi vs balram chaudhary — 179/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,3/4. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON-COMPLIANCE on 04th May 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRDA210007742025
Filing Number
772/2025
Filing Date
12-Jun-2025
Registration No
179/2025
Registration Date
12-Jun-2025
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON-COMPLIANCE
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.kumkum devi
Respondent(s)
-
1.balram chaudhary
-
2.ramakant chaudhary
-
3.radhakrishan chaudhary
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed Kumkum Devi's petition (CIR No. 179/2025) filed before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Biraul on 04-05-2026 for lack of prosecution. Despite multiple opportunities, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear for hearings, demonstrating lack of interest in the case. The court ordered the case records be deposited in the archive as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
14-Nov-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
26-Aug-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
11-Aug-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
14-Jul-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
26-Jun-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2025
The court dismissed Kumkum Devi's petition (CIR No. 179/2025) filed before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Biraul on 04-05-2026 for lack of prosecution. Despite multiple opportunities, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear for hearings, demonstrating lack of interest in the case. The court ordered the case records be deposited in the archive as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts