jamila khatun vs md taiyab — 131/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(1),191(3),126(2),115(2),303(20,74,352. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON-COMPLIANCE on 04th May 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRDA210005942025
Filing Number
592/2025
Filing Date
16-May-2025
Registration No
131/2025
Registration Date
16-May-2025
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON-COMPLIANCE
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.jamila khatun
Adv. Umesh Prasad Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.md taiyab
-
2.md md eklakh
-
3.md anwar
-
4.md saukat
-
5.darudan khatun
-
6.rubi khatun
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed Jamila Khatun's petition (CIR 131/2025) for non-prosecution on 04.05.2026. Despite multiple opportunities to appear, the petitioner remained absent from proceedings on several dates, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Birol, ordered dismissal of the petition in default and directed the office clerk to file records in the registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
14-Nov-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
26-Aug-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
28-Jul-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Jun-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
07-Jun-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 131/2025
The court dismissed Jamila Khatun's petition (CIR 131/2025) for non-prosecution on 04.05.2026. Despite multiple opportunities to appear, the petitioner remained absent from proceedings on several dates, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Birol, ordered dismissal of the petition in default and directed the office clerk to file records in the registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts