Murlidhar Jha vs Mahadeo Jha and Others — 1164/2013

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,307,379,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRDA210004032013

Filing Number

1164/2013

Filing Date

12-Nov-2013

Registration No

1164/2013

Registration Date

12-Nov-2013

Court

Biraul CJM Division

Judge

2-S.D.J.M.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

298

Police Station

GHAN SHYAMPUR

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,307,379,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murlidhar Jha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahadeo Jha and Others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Summary The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all five accused persons (Mahadev Jha, Kanhaiya Kumar Jha, Gautam Kumar Jha, Durgesh Kumar Jha, and Rajendra Jha) of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 379, and 504. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (the informant) retracted his allegations during cross-examination, stating no assault occurred and that he was injured by falling, while no corroborating evidence or independent witnesses were produced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    S.D.J.M.

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    S.D.J.M.

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  8. 22-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  11. 13-Jun-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  12. 30-Apr-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  13. 28-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  14. 23-Dec-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  15. 11-Nov-2024

    Charge

    S.D.J.M.

  16. 22-Aug-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  17. 29-May-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  18. 06-Mar-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  19. 07-Dec-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  20. 23-Sep-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  21. 28-Jun-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  22. 28-Mar-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  23. 03-Jan-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  24. 12-Oct-2022

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  25. 13-Jul-2022

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  26. 22-Apr-2022

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  27. 22-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  28. 23-Oct-2021

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  29. 24-Jul-2021

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  30. 07-May-2021

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  31. 21-Jan-2021

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  32. 10-Sep-2020

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  33. 14-May-2020

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  34. 31-Jan-2020

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  35. 30-Jan-2020

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  36. 23-Sep-2019

    Order

  37. 23-Sep-2019

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  38. 28-Jun-2019

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  39. 21-Feb-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 12-Nov-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1164/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all five accused persons (Mahadev Jha, Kanhaiya Kumar Jha, Gautam Kumar Jha, Durgesh Kumar Jha, and Rajendra Jha) of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 379, and 504. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (the informant) retracted his allegations during cross-examination, stating no assault occurred and that he was injured by falling, while no corroborating evidence or independent witnesses were produced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case