Murlidhar Jha vs Mahadeo Jha and Others — 1164/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,307,379,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRDA210004032013
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1164/2013
Filing Date
12-11-2013
Registration No
1164/2013
Registration Date
12-11-2013
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
2-S.D.J.M.
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
298
Police Station
GHAN SHYAMPUR
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murlidhar Jha
Respondent(s)
Mahadeo Jha and Others
Hearing History
Judge: 2-S.D.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
Appearence
Appearence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 17-02-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE | |
| 12-02-2026 | Appearence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Appearence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all five accused persons (Mahadev Jha, Kanhaiya Kumar Jha, Gautam Kumar Jha, Durgesh Kumar Jha, and Rajendra Jha) of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 379, and 504. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (the informant) retracted his allegations during cross-examination, stating no assault occurred and that he was injured by falling, while no corroborating evidence or independent witnesses were produced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all five accused persons (Mahadev Jha, Kanhaiya Kumar Jha, Gautam Kumar Jha, Durgesh Kumar Jha, and Rajendra Jha) of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 379, and 504. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (the informant) retracted his allegations during cross-examination, stating no assault occurred and that he was injured by falling, while no corroborating evidence or independent witnesses were produced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts