SINKU DEVI vs Shravan kumar yadav — 53/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),85,82,3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRDA210003132025
Filing Number
312/2025
Filing Date
01-Mar-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
01-Mar-2025
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SINKU DEVI
Adv. Baidhnath Chaupal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shravan kumar yadav
-
2.sumitra devi
-
3.fuldai devi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the complaint case filed by Sinku Kumari against three accused persons under Section 226 of BNSS, 2023, due to lack of prima facie evidence. The dismissal was based on the complainant's continuous absence from court proceedings since May 16, 2025, failure to adduce any inquiry evidence, and the absence of corroborating material to establish the alleged offences, applying the legal principle that "the law will not help those who sleep over their own rights." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
28-Nov-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
14-Oct-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
09-Sep-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
18-Aug-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
01-Aug-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 2nd Class-I
-
18-Jul-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 2nd Class-I
-
01-Jul-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 2nd Class-I
-
11-Jun-2025
Hearing
Judicial Magistrate 2nd Class-I
-
30-Apr-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
19-Apr-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
03-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2025
The court dismissed the complaint case filed by Sinku Kumari against three accused persons under Section 226 of BNSS, 2023, due to lack of prima facie evidence. The dismissal was based on the complainant's continuous absence from court proceedings since May 16, 2025, failure to adduce any inquiry evidence, and the absence of corroborating material to establish the alleged offences, applying the legal principle that "the law will not help those who sleep over their own rights." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts