JAGARNATH PD MUKHIYA vs KAPILDEV MUKHIYA AND OTHERS — 209/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341. Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGE on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: BRDA210002132016

Filing Number

209/2016

Filing Date

01-Aug-2016

Registration No

209/2016

Registration Date

01-Aug-2016

Court

Biraul CJM Division

Judge

2-S.D.J.M.

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISCHARGE

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGARNATH PD MUKHIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAPILDEV MUKHIYA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court discharged the accused persons (Kapil Dev Mukhiya and others) in a criminal complaint filed under IPC sections 323 and 418. The court found insufficient evidence to frame charges, as the complainant failed to examine any before-charge witnesses despite multiple opportunities. The accused and their bailors were also discharged from bail bond liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    S.D.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Charge

    S.D.J.M.

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    S.D.J.M.

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    S.D.J.M.

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  9. 24-Jul-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  10. 16-May-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  11. 07-Mar-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  12. 16-Dec-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  13. 21-Sep-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  14. 19-Jun-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  15. 01-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  16. 05-Jan-2024

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  17. 01-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  18. 18-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  19. 20-May-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  20. 21-Feb-2023

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  21. 03-Dec-2022

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  22. 05-Sep-2022

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  23. 17-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  24. 29-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  25. 06-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  26. 13-Sep-2021

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  27. 21-Jun-2021

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  28. 20-Jun-2021

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  29. 16-Apr-2021

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  30. 15-Dec-2020

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  31. 22-Sep-2020

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  32. 06-Aug-2020

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  33. 25-Jun-2020

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  34. 04-May-2020

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  35. 19-Mar-2020

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  36. 12-Feb-2020

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  37. 24-Jan-2020

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -III

  38. 20-Dec-2019

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  39. 16-Oct-2019

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  40. 16-Aug-2019

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  41. 28-May-2019

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  42. 08-Apr-2019

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  43. 16-Jan-2019

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  44. 16-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 01-Aug-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 209/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused persons (Kapil Dev Mukhiya and others) in a criminal complaint filed under IPC sections 323 and 418. The court found insufficient evidence to frame charges, as the complainant failed to examine any before-charge witnesses despite multiple opportunities. The accused and their bailors were also discharged from bail bond liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case