jitni devi vs ramu sharma and others — 1314/2013

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,498A 504/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRDA210001482013

Filing Number

1314/2013

Filing Date

18-Dec-2013

Registration No

1314/2013

Registration Date

18-Dec-2013

Court

Biraul CJM Division

Judge

2-S.D.J.M.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

415

Police Station

BIRAUL

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,498A 504/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.jitni devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ramu sharma and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Case Summary The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul acquitted all three accused persons (Ramu Sharma, Ganga Sharma, and Rajo Devi) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504 r/w 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as all three prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and disowned the allegations of dowry-related torture and attempted murder. The complainant was not produced as a witness, and no medical or investigative officer evidence was presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    S.D.J.M.

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    S.D.J.M.

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  9. 15-Nov-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  10. 18-Oct-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  12. 26-Aug-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  15. 01-Jul-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  16. 09-Apr-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  17. 11-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    S.D.J.M.

  18. 30-Jan-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  19. 15-Jan-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  20. 12-Dec-2024

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  21. 28-Nov-2024

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  22. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  23. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  24. 20-May-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  25. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  26. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  27. 05-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  28. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  29. 23-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  30. 13-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  31. 27-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  32. 24-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  33. 23-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  34. 30-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  35. 08-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  36. 10-May-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  37. 28-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  38. 04-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  39. 21-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  40. 06-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  41. 19-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  42. 28-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  43. 11-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  44. 12-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  45. 21-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  46. 26-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  47. 30-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  48. 20-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  49. 17-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  50. 03-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  51. 02-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  52. 02-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  53. 01-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  54. 07-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 18-Dec-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1314/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul acquitted all three accused persons (Ramu Sharma, Ganga Sharma, and Rajo Devi) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504 r/w 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as all three prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and disowned the allegations of dowry-related torture and attempted murder. The complainant was not produced as a witness, and no medical or investigative officer evidence was presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case