jitni devi vs ramu sharma and others — 1314/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,498A 504/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRDA210001482013
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1314/2013
Filing Date
18-12-2013
Registration No
1314/2013
Registration Date
18-12-2013
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
2-S.D.J.M.
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
415
Police Station
BIRAUL
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
jitni devi
Respondent(s)
ramu sharma and others
Hearing History
Judge: 2-S.D.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-11-2025 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul acquitted all three accused persons (Ramu Sharma, Ganga Sharma, and Rajo Devi) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504 r/w 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as all three prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and disowned the allegations of dowry-related torture and attempted murder. The complainant was not produced as a witness, and no medical or investigative officer evidence was presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul acquitted all three accused persons (Ramu Sharma, Ganga Sharma, and Rajo Devi) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504 r/w 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as all three prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and disowned the allegations of dowry-related torture and attempted murder. The complainant was not produced as a witness, and no medical or investigative officer evidence was presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts