Munni devi vs Shivshankar manjhi — 354/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,354B, 504/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRDA210000922015

Filing Number

354/2015

Filing Date

12-Apr-2015

Registration No

354/2015

Registration Date

12-Apr-2015

Court

Biraul CJM Division

Judge

2-S.D.J.M.

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,354B, 504/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Munni devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivshankar manjhi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Summary of Case 354/2015 The court acquitted all seven accused persons of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, and 504 based on a compromise petition filed by the parties; regarding the non-compoundable charge under section 354(B) (attempted disrobing), the court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Both key prosecution witnesses—the informant (Munni Devi) and victim (Khushboo Kumari)—retracted their allegations during cross-examination, stating no molestation occurred and that they had compromised with the accused persons, leaving insufficient evidence to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    S.D.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  9. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  10. 20-May-2025

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  11. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  12. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  13. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  14. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  15. 22-May-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  16. 05-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  17. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  18. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  19. 17-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  20. 19-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  21. 31-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  22. 26-May-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  23. 03-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  24. 08-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  25. 03-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  26. 29-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  27. 31-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  28. 29-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  29. 26-May-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  30. 06-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  31. 13-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  32. 01-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  33. 15-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  34. 26-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  35. 05-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  36. 15-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  37. 15-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  38. 22-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  39. 29-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  40. 02-May-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  41. 24-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  42. 20-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  43. 17-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  44. 08-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  45. 15-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  46. 05-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    S.D.J.M.

  47. 11-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 12-Apr-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 354/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 354/2015 The court acquitted all seven accused persons of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, and 504 based on a compromise petition filed by the parties; regarding the non-compoundable charge under section 354(B) (attempted disrobing), the court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Both key prosecution witnesses—the informant (Munni Devi) and victim (Khushboo Kumari)—retracted their allegations during cross-examination, stating no molestation occurred and that they had compromised with the accused persons, leaving insufficient evidence to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case