LALIT THAKUR vs DAYANAND THAKUR — 21119/2001
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,323,379,504,447. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th June 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRDA210000692001
Filing Number
21119/2001
Filing Date
13-Mar-2001
Registration No
21119/2001
Registration Date
13-Mar-2001
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
JAMALPUR
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALIT THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAYANAND THAKUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Lalit Thakur v. Dayanand Thakur (GR 21119/2001) Decision (10 June 2026): The court acquitted all three accused—Dayanand Thakur, Khagan Thakur, and Bhola Thakur—of charges under IPC sections 147, 148/149, 506/149, 452/149, 323/149, 341/149, 504/149 and the Arms Act. Reasoning: The prosecution produced only four witnesses (including the informant Lalit Thakur), three of whom were declared hostile by the court. The insufficient and unreliable testimony failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Despite the seriousness of the allegations, after 25 years, the prosecution lacked sufficient documentary evidence to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-Jun-2026
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
25-May-2026
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
15-May-2026
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
11-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-III
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-III
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
12-Aug-2024
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
11-Aug-2024
Evidence
Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate II
-
01-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
14-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
13-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
01-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
13-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-Apr-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
27-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
08-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
12-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
23-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
19-May-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
19-Feb-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
29-Nov-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Aug-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
31-May-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
26-Apr-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
28-Jan-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
09-Oct-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
24-Jun-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
17-Mar-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
17-Jan-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
25-Oct-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
16-Jul-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
24-May-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
23-Mar-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-Jan-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
27-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2001
Case filed
Registration No. 21119/2001
Case Summary: Lalit Thakur v. Dayanand Thakur (GR 21119/2001) Decision (10 June 2026): The court acquitted all three accused—Dayanand Thakur, Khagan Thakur, and Bhola Thakur—of charges under IPC sections 147, 148/149, 506/149, 452/149, 323/149, 341/149, 504/149 and the Arms Act. Reasoning: The prosecution produced only four witnesses (including the informant Lalit Thakur), three of whom were declared hostile by the court. The insufficient and unreliable testimony failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Despite the seriousness of the allegations, after 25 years, the prosecution lacked sufficient documentary evidence to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts