Ajay Kumar Singh vs Rajesh Sahu — 950/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,379,354,(B)504/34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th August 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRDA210000032016
Filing Number
950/2016
Filing Date
14-Dec-2016
Registration No
950/2016
Registration Date
14-Dec-2016
Court
Biraul CJM Division
Judge
2-S.D.J.M.
Last updated 16-Aug-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajay Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajesh Sahu
Case History
-
17-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
04-Apr-2026
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
23-Aug-2025
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
29-Oct-2024
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
02-Sep-2024
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
04-May-2024
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
30-Sep-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
28-Jul-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
25-May-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
10-Apr-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
17-Feb-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
24-Jan-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
03-Jan-2023
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
12-Oct-2022
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
05-Sep-2022
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
25-Jul-2022
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
23-May-2022
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
23-Apr-2022
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
24-Jan-2022
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
25-Oct-2021
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
26-Jul-2021
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
10-May-2021
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
19-Mar-2021
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
04-Jan-2021
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
06-Nov-2020
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
05-Sep-2020
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
14-Jul-2020
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
19-May-2020
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2020
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
09-Jan-2020
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
07-Nov-2019
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
23-Aug-2019
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
27-Jun-2019
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
18-Apr-2019
Evidence
S.D.J.M.
-
28-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Dec-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 950/2016
Explore other courts