Kalam alias Mohammad Kalam vs State of Bihar — 332/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 29th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA200017662025
Filing Number
1708/2025
Filing Date
03-11-2025
Registration No
332/2025
Registration Date
03-11-2025
Court
Biraul DJ Division
Judge
1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
107
Police Station
BIRAUL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalam alias Mohammad Kalam
Adv. Shashi Kant Roy
Kalim alias Mohammad Kalim
Adv. Shashi Kant Roy
Nasim alias Mohammad Nasim
Adv. Shashi Kant Roy
Salamat alias Md Salamat Kujara
Adv. Shashi Kant Roy
Sajira alias Sanjira Khatoon
Adv. Shashi Kant Roy
Roshan alias Roshan Khatoon
Adv. Shashi Kant Roy
Atika alias Atika Praween
Adv. Shashi Kant Roy
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 27-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-04-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 332/2025 Summary: The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by seven petitioners (Kalam, Kalim, Nasim, and four family members) in a rape and attempted murder case. The court found that case diary statements from the informant (Rehana Khatoon) and supporting witnesses corroborated allegations that the petitioners were involved in kidnapping, rape, and attempting to drown the informant and her daughter, making the gravity of offences too serious to grant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 332/2025 Summary: The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by seven petitioners (Kalam, Kalim, Nasim, and four family members) in a rape and attempted murder case. The court found that case diary statements from the informant (Rehana Khatoon) and supporting witnesses corroborated allegations that the petitioners were involved in kidnapping, rape, and attempting to drown the informant and her daughter, making the gravity of offences too serious to grant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts