Sona Devi vs Laxman Chaupal — 180/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,506,504/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRDA200002252025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

215/2025

Filing Date

30-04-2024

Registration No

180/2025

Registration Date

30-04-2024

Court

Biraul DJ Division

Judge

1-District Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,506,504/34

Petitioner(s)

Sona Devi

Respondent(s)

Laxman Chaupal

Buchhi Devi

Jaymala devi

Bijli Devi

Sanju Devi

Nisha Devi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge

25-03-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

09-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

25-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506, and 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the three prosecution witnesses, including the informant and the victim, contradicted the FIR allegations by testifying they did not witness any assault by the accused and that injuries resulted from the victim falling while chasing a duck. The court applied the cardinal principle that the burden lies on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and discharged the accused from bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506, and 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the three prosecution witnesses, including the informant and the victim, contradicted the FIR allegations by testifying they did not witness any assault by the accused and that injuries resulted from the victim falling while chasing a duck. The court applied the cardinal principle that the burden lies on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and discharged the accused from bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Biraul DJ Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case