Sona Devi vs Laxman Chaupal — 180/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,506,504/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRDA200002252025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
215/2025
Filing Date
30-04-2024
Registration No
180/2025
Registration Date
30-04-2024
Court
Biraul DJ Division
Judge
1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sona Devi
Respondent(s)
Laxman Chaupal
Buchhi Devi
Jaymala devi
Bijli Devi
Sanju Devi
Nisha Devi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506, and 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the three prosecution witnesses, including the informant and the victim, contradicted the FIR allegations by testifying they did not witness any assault by the accused and that injuries resulted from the victim falling while chasing a duck. The court applied the cardinal principle that the burden lies on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and discharged the accused from bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506, and 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the three prosecution witnesses, including the informant and the victim, contradicted the FIR allegations by testifying they did not witness any assault by the accused and that injuries resulted from the victim falling while chasing a duck. The court applied the cardinal principle that the burden lies on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and discharged the accused from bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts