Santan Chaupal vs State of Bihar — 67/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),126(2),115(2),109(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRDA200002062026

Case disposed

Filing Number

204/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Biraul DJ Division

Judge

1-District Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

KUSESHWRA ASTHAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),126(2),115(2),109(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Santan Chaupal

Adv. JITENDRA KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge

10-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

ORDER

19-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: Santan Chaupal vs. State of Bihar (BP No. 67/2026) The court granted bail to Santan Chaupal, accused of assaulting the informant's son with a knife with intent to kill, because despite over one and a half months of custody, the police failed to obtain the injury report, resulting in no medical evidence on record to substantiate the prosecution's case. The petitioner, who had no criminal antecedents, was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Santan Chaupal vs. State of Bihar (BP No. 67/2026) The court granted bail to Santan Chaupal, accused of assaulting the informant's son with a knife with intent to kill, because despite over one and a half months of custody, the police failed to obtain the injury report, resulting in no medical evidence on record to substantiate the prosecution's case. The petitioner, who had no criminal antecedents, was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Biraul DJ Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case