Md Matibul vs State of Bihar — 61/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),126(2),115(2),109(1),351(2),352,76,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRDA200001882026
Filing Number
186/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
61/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Biraul DJ Division
Judge
1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
84
Police Station
BIRAUL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Md Matibul
Adv. Sri Uttam Chaupal
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 61/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul, allowed the bail petition of Md. Matibul, who was in judicial custody since February 22, 2026, for charges including criminal intimidation, assault, and attempt to commit culpable homicide under BNS sections arising from an alleged armed attack on February 7, 2026. The court granted bail considering that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, the case had been compromised between the parties (supported by the informant's presence in court), and the petitioner posed no flight risk. Matibul was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 61/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul, allowed the bail petition of Md. Matibul, who was in judicial custody since February 22, 2026, for charges including criminal intimidation, assault, and attempt to commit culpable homicide under BNS sections arising from an alleged armed attack on February 7, 2026. The court granted bail considering that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, the case had been compromised between the parties (supported by the informant's presence in court), and the petitioner posed no flight risk. Matibul was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts