Sohail Ahmad vs State of Bihar — 92/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,420,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA200001762026

Filing Number

174/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

92/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Biraul DJ Division

Judge

1-District Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,420,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sohail Ahmad

    Adv. RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 92/2026 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Suhail Ahmad on March 25, 2026, in a criminal case involving alleged property mutation fraud and assault (IPC §323, 341, 504, 420, 34). Key Reasoning: The court considered that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, is 70 years old and in ill health, this is his first appearance after cognizance, and the case involves weak evidence (no visible injuries despite assault allegations, with §420 elements absent). The petitioner furnished bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 92/2026 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Suhail Ahmad on March 25, 2026, in a criminal case involving alleged property mutation fraud and assault (IPC §323, 341, 504, 420, 34). Key Reasoning: The court considered that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, is 70 years old and in ill health, this is his first appearance after cognizance, and the case involves weak evidence (no visible injuries despite assault allegations, with §420 elements absent). The petitioner furnished bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case