Sohail Ahmad vs State of Bihar — 92/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,420,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA200001762026

Case disposed

Filing Number

174/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

92/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Biraul DJ Division

Judge

1-District Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,420,34

Petitioner(s)

Sohail Ahmad

Adv. RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge

25-03-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

ORDER

16-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 92/2026 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Suhail Ahmad on March 25, 2026, in a criminal case involving alleged property mutation fraud and assault (IPC §323, 341, 504, 420, 34). Key Reasoning: The court considered that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, is 70 years old and in ill health, this is his first appearance after cognizance, and the case involves weak evidence (no visible injuries despite assault allegations, with §420 elements absent). The petitioner furnished bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 92/2026 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Suhail Ahmad on March 25, 2026, in a criminal case involving alleged property mutation fraud and assault (IPC §323, 341, 504, 420, 34). Key Reasoning: The court considered that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, is 70 years old and in ill health, this is his first appearance after cognizance, and the case involves weak evidence (no visible injuries despite assault allegations, with §420 elements absent). The petitioner furnished bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Biraul DJ Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case