Sohail Ahmad vs State of Bihar — 92/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,420,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA200001762026
Filing Number
174/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
92/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Biraul DJ Division
Judge
1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sohail Ahmad
Adv. RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 92/2026 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Suhail Ahmad on March 25, 2026, in a criminal case involving alleged property mutation fraud and assault (IPC §323, 341, 504, 420, 34). Key Reasoning: The court considered that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, is 70 years old and in ill health, this is his first appearance after cognizance, and the case involves weak evidence (no visible injuries despite assault allegations, with §420 elements absent). The petitioner furnished bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 92/2026 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Biraul granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Suhail Ahmad on March 25, 2026, in a criminal case involving alleged property mutation fraud and assault (IPC §323, 341, 504, 420, 34). Key Reasoning: The court considered that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, is 70 years old and in ill health, this is his first appearance after cognizance, and the case involves weak evidence (no visible injuries despite assault allegations, with §420 elements absent). The petitioner furnished bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts