Purushottam Chaudhary vs State of Bihar — 76/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,308,379,504,34. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA200001442026
Filing Number
142/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
76/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
Biraul DJ Division
Judge
1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
394
Police Station
BIRAUL
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Purushottam Chaudhary
Adv. Sudhir kumar Mishra
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 76/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge disposed of Purushottam Chaudhary's anticipatory bail petition in connection with Biraul PS Case No. 394/2020, involving charges of criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, causing grievous hurt, attempt to cause death, theft, and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 379, 504, and 34. The court found the petitioner to be of clean antecedent, noting he was on notice during investigation and is a man of means unlikely to abscond. The petition was disposed off with directions for the petitioner to surrender before the lower court within six weeks and seek regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 76/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge disposed of Purushottam Chaudhary's anticipatory bail petition in connection with Biraul PS Case No. 394/2020, involving charges of criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, causing grievous hurt, attempt to cause death, theft, and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 379, 504, and 34. The court found the petitioner to be of clean antecedent, noting he was on notice during investigation and is a man of means unlikely to abscond. The petition was disposed off with directions for the petitioner to surrender before the lower court within six weeks and seek regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts