Purushottam Chaudhary vs State of Bihar — 76/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,308,379,504,34. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA200001442026

Case disposed

Filing Number

142/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Biraul DJ Division

Judge

1-District Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

394

Police Station

BIRAUL

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,308,379,504,34

Petitioner(s)

Purushottam Chaudhary

Adv. Sudhir kumar Mishra

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge

25-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

ORDER

16-03-2026

HEARING

02-03-2026

HEARING

18-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order

Case 76/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge disposed of Purushottam Chaudhary's anticipatory bail petition in connection with Biraul PS Case No. 394/2020, involving charges of criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, causing grievous hurt, attempt to cause death, theft, and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 379, 504, and 34. The court found the petitioner to be of clean antecedent, noting he was on notice during investigation and is a man of means unlikely to abscond. The petition was disposed off with directions for the petitioner to surrender before the lower court within six weeks and seek regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 76/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge disposed of Purushottam Chaudhary's anticipatory bail petition in connection with Biraul PS Case No. 394/2020, involving charges of criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, causing grievous hurt, attempt to cause death, theft, and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 379, 504, and 34. The court found the petitioner to be of clean antecedent, noting he was on notice during investigation and is a man of means unlikely to abscond. The petition was disposed off with directions for the petitioner to surrender before the lower court within six weeks and seek regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Biraul DJ Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case