Suraj Singh alias Surya Pratap Singh vs State of Bihar — 66/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),115(2),126(2),109,117(1),303(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA200001312026
Filing Number
129/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
Biraul DJ Division
Judge
1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
04
Police Station
BIRAUL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suraj Singh alias Surya Pratap Singh
Adv. Swatantra Mishra
Pappu Kumar Singh
Adv. Swatantra Mishra
Brij Bihari Singh
Adv. Swatantra Mishra
Bablu Singh
Adv. Swatantra Mishra
Chanchal Devi
Adv. Swatantra Mishra
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 19-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five petitioners (Suraj Singh, Pappu Kumar Singh, Brij Bihari Singh, Bablu Singh, and Chanchal Devi) who faced charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and theft under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The court found the prosecution's allegations specific and credible, supported by consistent statements from the informant and injured witnesses detailing the petitioners' involvement in a violent incident on 02.01.2026, as well as medical reports confirming serious injuries including head wounds and fractures sustained by multiple victims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five petitioners (Suraj Singh, Pappu Kumar Singh, Brij Bihari Singh, Bablu Singh, and Chanchal Devi) who faced charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and theft under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The court found the prosecution's allegations specific and credible, supported by consistent statements from the informant and injured witnesses detailing the petitioners' involvement in a violent incident on 02.01.2026, as well as medical reports confirming serious injuries including head wounds and fractures sustained by multiple victims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts