Jeetendra Jha alias Mangnu Jha vs State of Bihar — 43/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),126(2),115(2),109(1),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA200000742026

Case disposed

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

43/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

Biraul DJ Division

Judge

1-District Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

525

Police Station

BIRAUL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),126(2),115(2),109(1),351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Jeetendra Jha alias Mangnu Jha

Adv. Tribhuwan Narayan Jha

Kaushal Kumar Jha

Adv. Tribhuwan Narayan Jha

Pawan Kumar Jha

Adv. Tribhuwan Narayan Jha

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge

26-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Restored

25-03-2026

ORDER

25-03-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 43/2026 Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to all three petitioners (Jeetendra Jha, Kaushal Kumar Jha, and Pawan Kumar Jha) in a case involving alleged assault during a land dispute. The court found no criminal history against the petitioners and noted the absence of an injury report despite repeated directions, leading to the conclusion that the case appears to stem from a land dispute rather than criminal intent. Conditions: Bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 43/2026 Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to all three petitioners (Jeetendra Jha, Kaushal Kumar Jha, and Pawan Kumar Jha) in a case involving alleged assault during a land dispute. The court found no criminal history against the petitioners and noted the absence of an injury report despite repeated directions, leading to the conclusion that the case appears to stem from a land dispute rather than criminal intent. Conditions: Bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Biraul DJ Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case