Mukund Kumar Jha vs State of Bihar — 13/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,120(B),186,188,341,342,323,324,325,332,333,353,307,337,354(B),504,506. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 15th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA200000242026
Filing Number
24/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
Biraul DJ Division
Judge
1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
BIRAUL
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mukund Kumar Jha
Adv. Suman Kumar Sahu
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ABP No. 13/2026 Decision: The court rejected Mukund Kumar Jha's anticipatory bail petition. Key Reasoning: The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on witness statements, injury reports documenting police injuries, and investigation findings linking him to a March 2024 incident where he allegedly incited 100-200 persons to storm the police station, obstruct police duties, and assault officers with weapons following a death caused by rash motorcycle driving. Given the serious allegations and ongoing investigation, the court determined bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABP No. 13/2026 Decision: The court rejected Mukund Kumar Jha's anticipatory bail petition. Key Reasoning: The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on witness statements, injury reports documenting police injuries, and investigation findings linking him to a March 2024 incident where he allegedly incited 100-200 persons to storm the police station, obstruct police duties, and assault officers with weapons following a death caused by rash motorcycle driving. Given the serious allegations and ongoing investigation, the court determined bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts