Nandan Prasad Sahu vs State of Bihar — 6/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
Miscellaneous
CNR: BRDA120000292025
Filing Number
29/2025
Filing Date
22-Feb-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
22-Feb-2025
Court
Civil Div. Benipur
Judge
19-Civil Judge (Senior Division)
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nandan Prasad Sahu
Adv. Manoj Kumar Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
03-Jun-2025
Restored
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division)
-
25-Apr-2025
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary: The miscellaneous petition (Reg. No. 06/2025) filed by Nandan Prasad Vahu before the First Additional District Judge, Benipur, has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner had abandoned the original suit (No. 215/2014) without genuine interest, failed to appear for two years, and only filed this petition after the original suit was dismissed—indicating an attempt to delay proceedings rather than seek justice. The petition was deemed not maintainable and accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2025
Summary: The miscellaneous petition (Reg. No. 06/2025) filed by Nandan Prasad Vahu before the First Additional District Judge, Benipur, has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner had abandoned the original suit (No. 215/2014) without genuine interest, failed to appear for two years, and only filed this petition after the original suit was dismissed—indicating an attempt to delay proceedings rather than seek justice. The petition was deemed not maintainable and accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts