Asha Devi vs Dinesh Mandal and Others 08 — 275/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,341,323,308,354B,504,427,447,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRDA100006922024

Filing Number

275/2024

Filing Date

12-Jun-2024

Registration No

275/2024

Registration Date

12-Jun-2024

Court

D J Division, Benipur

Judge

17-District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

376

Police Station

BAHERA

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,341,323,308,354B,504,427,447,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Asha Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh Mandal and Others 08

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 275/2024 - State vs. Dinesh Mandal & Others Decision: The court acquitted all eight accused persons of charges under IPC sections 143/34, 323/34, 341/34, 308/34, 447/34, 504/34, 427/34, and 354(B). Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed due to failure to establish accused identity. Although both witnesses (informant Asha Devi and her daughter) confirmed an assault occurred on 15-09-2023, neither could identify who committed specific acts during the incident. The court found prosecution witnesses could not support their own allegations during cross-examination, and the principle that prosecution must stand on its own legs was not satisfied. Without establishing identity of assailants—crucial in criminal cases—conviction was impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  14. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  15. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  17. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  18. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  19. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  20. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  21. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  22. 04-Dec-2024

    Appearence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  23. 25-Oct-2024

    Appearence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  24. 18-Sep-2024

    Appearence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  25. 06-Aug-2024

    Appearence

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-II

  26. 16-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 12-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 275/2024 - State vs. Dinesh Mandal & Others Decision: The court acquitted all eight accused persons of charges under IPC sections 143/34, 323/34, 341/34, 308/34, 447/34, 504/34, 427/34, and 354(B). Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed due to failure to establish accused identity. Although both witnesses (informant Asha Devi and her daughter) confirmed an assault occurred on 15-09-2023, neither could identify who committed specific acts during the incident. The court found prosecution witnesses could not support their own allegations during cross-examination, and the principle that prosecution must stand on its own legs was not satisfied. Without establishing identity of assailants—crucial in criminal cases—conviction was impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case