Laxmi Devi vs Kundan Kumar Alias Babam — 80/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,342,323,308,504. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRDA100002422020
Filing Number
80/2020
Filing Date
17-06-2020
Registration No
80/2020
Registration Date
17-06-2020
Court
D J Division, Benipur
Judge
17-District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
504
Police Station
BAHERA
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmi Devi
Adv. UN
Respondent(s)
Kundan Kumar Alias Babam
Raman Devi
Mani Kumari
Hearing History
Judge: 17-District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 80/2020 Summary The court acquitted all four accused persons (Kundan Kumar Jha alias Bambam, Raman Devi, Mani Kumari, and Jagarnath Jha) of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 342, 308, 504, 506/34, citing complete absence of evidence. Despite multiple opportunities, summons, bailable warrants, and NBW orders issued over four years, the prosecution failed to produce any witness—including the informant or alleged victim—to substantiate the assault and robbery allegations. The court held that conviction cannot rest on conjecture and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, which it failed to do. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 80/2020 Summary The court acquitted all four accused persons (Kundan Kumar Jha alias Bambam, Raman Devi, Mani Kumari, and Jagarnath Jha) of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 342, 308, 504, 506/34, citing complete absence of evidence. Despite multiple opportunities, summons, bailable warrants, and NBW orders issued over four years, the prosecution failed to produce any witness—including the informant or alleged victim—to substantiate the assault and robbery allegations. The court held that conviction cannot rest on conjecture and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, which it failed to do. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts