DHALAI YADAV vs State of Bihar — 70/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,303(2),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA100001372026
Filing Number
131/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
70/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
D J Division, Benipur
Judge
17-District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
513
Police Station
BAHERA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHALAI YADAV
Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR YADAV
-
2.BAUNU YADAV
-
3.PULISH YADAV
-
4.BELA YADAV
-
5.SHAMBHU YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Baunu Yadav (62) and Pulish Yadav (68) in a case involving alleged mob attack. Finding no specific allegations against the petitioners in the FIR despite charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5), the court noted the case involved counter-allegations between parties and released them on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, conditional on cooperation in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Disposed
District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 70/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Baunu Yadav (62) and Pulish Yadav (68) in a case involving alleged mob attack. Finding no specific allegations against the petitioners in the FIR despite charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5), the court noted the case involved counter-allegations between parties and released them on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, conditional on cooperation in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts