Leeladhar Yadav vs State of Bihar — 51/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA100000962026

Filing Number

92/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

51/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

D J Division, Benipur

Judge

17-District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

ALINAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Leeladhar Yadav

    Adv. Azad Alam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case 51/2026 Summary The District and Additional Sessions Judge rejected Leeladhar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a kidnapping case involving two minors (ages 12 and 14) from Alinagar PS Case No. 32 of 2025. The court found that victim statements recorded under Section 183 BNSS specifically identified the petitioner's participation in the kidnapping, and considering the grave nature of the offense and the petitioner's active role, bail was deemed inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additonal Sessions Judge-I

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Camp Court, Benipur

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 51/2026 Summary The District and Additional Sessions Judge rejected Leeladhar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a kidnapping case involving two minors (ages 12 and 14) from Alinagar PS Case No. 32 of 2025. The court found that victim statements recorded under Section 183 BNSS specifically identified the petitioner's participation in the kidnapping, and considering the grave nature of the offense and the petitioner's active role, bail was deemed inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case