LALESHWAR SINGH ALIAS LAL SINGH vs State of Bihar — 1117/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),74,352,351(2),315(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRDA010100002025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

9077/2025

Filing Date

20-12-2025

Registration No

1117/2025

Registration Date

20-12-2025

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

PATOR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),74,352,351(2),315(5)

Petitioner(s)

LALESHWAR SINGH ALIAS LAL SINGH

Adv. Sanjay Kumar Sahni

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of order

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, denied bail to petitioner Laleshwar Singh in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation, criminal conspiracy, and voluntarily causing hurt with weapons. The court rejected the bail plea primarily because the victim sustained grievous injuries from repeated blows to the head (a vital part of the body), supported by witness testimony, despite the petitioner's argument that he merely gave orders without committing any overt act of assault himself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, denied bail to petitioner Laleshwar Singh in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation, criminal conspiracy, and voluntarily causing hurt with weapons. The court rejected the bail plea primarily because the victim sustained grievous injuries from repeated blows to the head (a vital part of the body), supported by witness testimony, despite the petitioner's argument that he merely gave orders without committing any overt act of assault himself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Darbhanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case