NANDNI DEVI vs State of Bihar — 1745/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,140(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA010094712025
Filing Number
8584/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
1745/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
492
Police Station
BAHADURPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANDNI DEVI
Adv. AMBER IMAM HASHMI
-
2.BINOD PASWAN
-
3.RUBI DEVI
-
4.SUMAN KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga dismissed the anticipatory bail petition (u/s 438 Cr.P.C.) filed by four accused persons for non-prosecution. The petitioners had filed the application on 04.12.2025 but failed to press their bail petition for eleven months despite multiple opportunities, demonstrating complete loss of interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1745/2025
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga dismissed the anticipatory bail petition (u/s 438 Cr.P.C.) filed by four accused persons for non-prosecution. The petitioners had filed the application on 04.12.2025 but failed to press their bail petition for eleven months despite multiple opportunities, demonstrating complete loss of interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts