CHANDAN KUMAR vs NITISH MAHTO — 677/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,342,323,307,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRDA010092882025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8412/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
677/2025
Registration Date
27-11-2025
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
269
Police Station
L.N.M. UNIVERSITY
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
NITISH MAHTO
SAURABH DAS URF SAURAB RASTOGI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Court of Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, acquitted all four accused persons (Gaurav Kumar Das, Sanjay Kumar Mahto, Monu Thakur, and Gautam Kumar) of charges under IPC sections 341/149, 307/149, 504/149, 506/149, and 148. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that key prosecution witnesses testified they did not directly witness the alleged assault incident that occurred in darkness, could not identify the actual assailants, and took accused persons' names only on villagers' suggestion. The accused were accordingly acquitted and released from their bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Court of Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, acquitted all four accused persons (Gaurav Kumar Das, Sanjay Kumar Mahto, Monu Thakur, and Gautam Kumar) of charges under IPC sections 341/149, 307/149, 504/149, 506/149, and 148. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that key prosecution witnesses testified they did not directly witness the alleged assault incident that occurred in darkness, could not identify the actual assailants, and took accused persons' names only on villagers' suggestion. The accused were accordingly acquitted and released from their bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts