RAJA YADAV vs State of Bihar — 409/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,115(2),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA010022342026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2074/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
409/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
391
Police Station
BAHERI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJA YADAV
Adv. Ramapati Jha
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the anticipatory bail application of Raja Yadav (age 20), who faces charges under BNS Sections 64, 115(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5) for allegedly seducing a woman on the pretext of marriage and subsequently abandoning and assaulting her. The court held that the serious nature of the rape allegations and established judicial precedent that compromise cannot override bail considerations in grave offences warranted denial of anticipatory bail, despite the petitioner's claim of false implication and settlement between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the anticipatory bail application of Raja Yadav (age 20), who faces charges under BNS Sections 64, 115(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5) for allegedly seducing a woman on the pretext of marriage and subsequently abandoning and assaulting her. The court held that the serious nature of the rape allegations and established judicial precedent that compromise cannot override bail considerations in grave offences warranted denial of anticipatory bail, despite the petitioner's claim of false implication and settlement between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts