JHAROKHI PASWAN vs State of Bihar — 231/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,361(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRDA010021982026

Filing Number

2043/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

231/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

SIMRI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,361(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JHAROKHI PASWAN

    Adv. Kumar Nalin Chouhan

  2. 2.ANIL PASWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Court of Sessions Judge, Darbhanga allowed the bail petition of accused Jharokhi Paswan and Anil Paswan, who faced charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352, and 3(5) arising from a land dispute and assault case. The court granted bail considering the accused had no criminal antecedents, the injured sustained only simple injuries, petitioner no.1 was 69 years old, and they had already undergone custody since 24.02.2026. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 231/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Sessions Judge, Darbhanga allowed the bail petition of accused Jharokhi Paswan and Anil Paswan, who faced charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352, and 3(5) arising from a land dispute and assault case. The court granted bail considering the accused had no criminal antecedents, the injured sustained only simple injuries, petitioner no.1 was 69 years old, and they had already undergone custody since 24.02.2026. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case