MAJLOOM MANSOORI vs State of Bihar — 228/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRDA010021672026

Filing Number

2013/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

228/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

31-District and Addl. Sessions Judge X

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

212

Police Station

L.N.M. UNIVERSITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAJLOOM MANSOORI

    Adv. SHRAWAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary: The District and Sessions Court in Darbhanga granted bail to the applicant (Majlum Mansuri) in a vehicle theft case (FIR No. 212/25, Section 303(2) BNS) on March 30, 2026. The court found the charges weak, noted no stolen goods were recovered, and that the investigation was complete with no flight risk, ordering release on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to conditions that one surety be a relative and one be a local resident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge X

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge X

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge X

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District and Sessions Court in Darbhanga granted bail to the applicant (Majlum Mansuri) in a vehicle theft case (FIR No. 212/25, Section 303(2) BNS) on March 30, 2026. The court found the charges weak, noted no stolen goods were recovered, and that the investigation was complete with no flight risk, ordering release on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to conditions that one surety be a relative and one be a local resident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case