MOHAN RAY vs State of Bihar — 226/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),117(2),109,76,324(1),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRDA010021602026
Filing Number
2008/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
226/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
125
Police Station
DARBHANGA TOWN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAN RAY
Adv. Sujeet Kumar Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, granted bail to Mohan Ray in a temple robbery case involving alleged forcible entry, assault on priests, looting Rs. 43,000, and property damage. The court allowed bail on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, primarily because there were no specific allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and he had already spent considerable time in judicial custody since February 2026, with a condition that he not engage in similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 226/2026
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, granted bail to Mohan Ray in a temple robbery case involving alleged forcible entry, assault on priests, looting Rs. 43,000, and property damage. The court allowed bail on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, primarily because there were no specific allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and he had already spent considerable time in judicial custody since February 2026, with a condition that he not engage in similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts