MOHAN RAY vs State of Bihar — 226/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),117(2),109,76,324(1),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRDA010021602026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2008/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

226/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

125

Police Station

DARBHANGA TOWN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),117(2),109,76,324(1),351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

MOHAN RAY

Adv. Sujeet Kumar Yadav

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

09-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

HEARING

02-04-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Copy of order

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, granted bail to Mohan Ray in a temple robbery case involving alleged forcible entry, assault on priests, looting Rs. 43,000, and property damage. The court allowed bail on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, primarily because there were no specific allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and he had already spent considerable time in judicial custody since February 2026, with a condition that he not engage in similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, granted bail to Mohan Ray in a temple robbery case involving alleged forcible entry, assault on priests, looting Rs. 43,000, and property damage. The court allowed bail on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, primarily because there were no specific allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and he had already spent considerable time in judicial custody since February 2026, with a condition that he not engage in similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Darbhanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case