Sanjeev Singh Alias Sanjeev Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar — 396/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,342,353. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010021342026

Filing Number

1985/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

396/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

226

Police Station

BAHADURPUR

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,342,353

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjeev Singh Alias Sanjeev Kumar Singh

    Adv. Kumar Nalin Chouhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, granted anticipatory bail to Sanjeev Singh in a case involving road obstruction and unlawful assembly during a protest over a murder victim. The court found that investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, the petitioner had cooperated without misusing liberty, and no specific overt act was attributed to him individually. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 396/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, granted anticipatory bail to Sanjeev Singh in a case involving road obstruction and unlawful assembly during a protest over a murder victim. The court found that investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, the petitioner had cooperated without misusing liberty, and no specific overt act was attributed to him individually. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case