CHANDAN DAS vs State of Bihar — 219/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)a,26. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRDA010020882026

Filing Number

1939/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

219/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

149

Police Station

Benta

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-B)a,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDAN DAS

    Adv. MAHESH KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court of Darbhanga granted bail to Chandan Das, who was arrested for illegal possession of a country-made pistol with seven cartridges under the Arms Act. The court allowed the bail petition considering the completed investigation, submitted chargesheet, and the petitioner's custody period of over six months, imposing conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties and requiring his cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 219/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court of Darbhanga granted bail to Chandan Das, who was arrested for illegal possession of a country-made pistol with seven cartridges under the Arms Act. The court allowed the bail petition considering the completed investigation, submitted chargesheet, and the petitioner's custody period of over six months, imposing conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties and requiring his cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case