TULSI KUMAR MANDAL vs State of Bihar — 206/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRDA010019382026

Filing Number

1797/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

206/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

01

Police Station

NEHRA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TULSI KUMAR MANDAL

    Adv. Pinku Kumar Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge, Darbhanga granted bail to Tulsi Kumar Mandal, accused of stealing and transporting electrical materials under sections 317(5), 303(2) and 136 of the Bihar Electricity Act. The court found that no incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner's possession, he had no criminal antecedents, and had already spent significant time in custody since January 5, 2026. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on his non-repetition of the offense and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 206/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge, Darbhanga granted bail to Tulsi Kumar Mandal, accused of stealing and transporting electrical materials under sections 317(5), 303(2) and 136 of the Bihar Electricity Act. The court found that no incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner's possession, he had no criminal antecedents, and had already spent significant time in custody since January 5, 2026. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on his non-repetition of the offense and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case